# Multidimensional Scaling

In 12 hours I’ll be finishing my last exam for my masters! This one is for Data Mining and Exploration. One topic we covered was *Multidimensional Scaling* (MDS), which turns out to require a lot of the neat things we learned in class. MDS methods take similarity between pairs of points, such as distance, and uses them to estimate where the points are in space while trying to preserve their pairwise similarity. This method is useful if you want to visualize points but all you have is a measure of something like distance.

One way of doing MDS is to assume the similarities are Euclidean distances. While other MDS techniques require iterative optimization, the Euclidean-distance-based approach has a closed-form solution based on PCA.

To summarize, MDS takes in \( \Delta \), an \( N \times N \) symmetric matrix of distances, and returns a \( K \times N \) matrix of embedded data points, where \( N \) is the number of examples in our dataset, and \( K \) is a user-defined number of dimensions that the points should be in.

In order to demonstrate MDS, I first generate fake underlying data points and then compute distances from them. Then I’ll compute a few other forms that will be useful for comparision: the *Gram matrix* and a centered data matrix using a *centering matrix*.
Then I’ll apply MDS to the generated distance matrix. At the end, I apply MDS to a dataset of distances between North American cities resulting in the plot below. It might be squashed and upside-down, but it almost looks like a map of North America!

## Data generation

Usually the point of using MDS is you don’t have the underlying points. However, I’ll generate some points so I can get a distance matrix from them as well as compare intermediate forms. In this case, the underlying data is in a much higher dimension.

I’ll start with some Gaussian data that is rotated and shifted. I also define some constants:

- \( N \): the number of underlying data points.
- \( D \): the dimension of these points.
- \( K \): the dimension I want to the resulting data points to be in.

Heads up, in this post, I’m saying \( X \) has shape \( D \times N \).

## Centering matrix

In order to implement MDS, I’ll need to use the *centering matrix*. This is given by the \( n \times n \) matrix

where \( \mathbb{I}_n \) is the identity matrix, and \( \mathbb{1}_n \times \mathbb{1}_n^{\top} \) multiplies out to be an \( n \times n \) matrix of 1’s. Given this, \( X \, C_N \) removes the sample average by row and \( C_D \, X \) removes the sample average by column.

To demonstrate this, I generated some 4-dimensional data with mean `[0, 1, 2, 3]`

. Then I multiply it by the magical \( \frac 1 n \mathbb{1}_n \times \mathbb{1}_n^{\top} \). Then I print a few columns of \( X \, \frac 1 n \mathbb{1}_n \times \mathbb{1}_n^{\top} \) to show that it’s roughly `[0, 1, 2, 3]`

.

```
originally shifted by [0 1 2 3]
averages found
[[-0.03951054 -0.03951054 -0.03951054 -0.03951054 -0.03951054 -0.03951054]
[ 1.01209654 1.01209654 1.01209654 1.01209654 1.01209654 1.01209654]
[ 2.01898754 2.01898754 2.01898754 2.01898754 2.01898754 2.01898754]
[ 2.9924229 2.9924229 2.9924229 2.9924229 2.9924229 2.9924229 ]]
```

I’ll make a function \( C_n \) I can use later. I’ll also create a centered set of \( X \) to have handy.

## Detour: PCA on centered \( X \)

The goal of this post is to plot data points in two dimensions using only the distances between them. But since I have underlying high-dimensional data points \( X \), as a warm-up I can apply PCA to them and plot the lower dimensional representation.

If singular value decomposition on the centered data points gives \( X = USV^{\top} \), then the lower dimensional locations are given by \( SV^{\top} \).

I show a little more about this in my singular value decomposition demo.

## Distance matrix

The distance matrix in this case is an \( N \times N \) matrix where the element at \( i, j \) is the Euclidean distance \( \delta_{ij} \) between example \( i \) and \( j \), and \( \delta_{ij} = | x_i^2 - x_j^2 | ^2 \). |

I’ll use `sklearn`

for this. This gets approximately the same results as

```
dist = np.zeros((N, N))
for i in range(N):
for j in range(N):
diff = X[:, i] - X[:, j]
dist_squared = diff.T @ diff
dist[i, j] = dist_squared
```

For fun, I can plot a corner of the distance matrix. This shows what I’d expect: the diagonal elements are 0 because the distance between a point and itself is 0. It’s otherwise symmetric and positive.

The distances also don’t care about whether the original data is centered or not. This makes sense since it’s just the points relative to each other, not in relation to a coordinate system.

## Gram matrix

This way of doing MDS works by getting the Gram matrix from the distance matrix. The Gram matrix is an \( N \times N \) matrix given by \( X^{\top}X \) using the centered \( X \).

### Double centering the Gram matrix

One can convert a Gram matrix from uncentered data to the Gram matrix from centered data using **double centering**. This makes sense looking at the linear algebra.

## PCA from the Gram matrix

It turns out once we have the Gram matrix, there’s a way to compute the principal component scores from the Gram matrix.

You can see how this works by looking at the singular value decomposition. When doing SVD on the observations \( X \) directly, then \( X \) becomes \( X = USV^{\top} \) and the PC scores are given by \( SV^\top \).

Here’s what happens to \( SV^{\top} \) in the Gram matrix. Remember S is a diagonal, and \( U \) and \( V \) are orthonormal (so \( U^{\top} = U^{-1} \) and \( UU^{\top} = \mathbb{I} \)):

\begin{align}
X^{\top}X &= G

&= (USV^{\top})^{\top}(USV^{\top})

&= VSU^{\top}USV^{\top}

&= VS^2V^{\top}.
\end{align}

Regular eigendecomposition on the Gram matrix gives

Matching this up with \( VS^2V^{\top} \) gives PC scores as \( \sqrt{\Lambda} Q^{\top} \) using the top \( K \) eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

## Gram matrix from distance matrix.

There’s one step missing: computing the Gram matrix from the distance matrix.

It turns out there’s a clever way to get the centered Gram matrix out of the distances using the centering matrix again. It’s given by

I can compare the Gram matrix given by this to the actual Gram matrix.

## MDS

Now I can put it all together!

## Viewing them all

When I plot these, I expect the points to be in the same place, though they might be rotated.

## North American Cities example

Inspired by this video let’s try MDS using the distances between cities.

This website has data in this form. (Heads up, it’s licensed under GNU LGPL) I’ll use one of the datasets that measure distances using latitude/longitude, rather than road distance. USCA312 is a dataset of 312 cities in the US and Canada. This MDS approach assumes Euclidean distances, but distances between locations on Earth are non-Euclidean, so there will be some approximation.

I’ll first download the data and process it.

### Computing PC Scores

Now that I have the distance matrix loaded, I’ll run the `MDS`

function defined above!

Now I’ll plot and label the states/provinces. I strip the city names out of the labels to make it a little easier to read.

One more plotting alternative is to plot one label per state/province.

## See Also

- MDS reminds me of t-sne, though MDS works on distance matrices.
- DME is the the course that taught me this.
- MDS on Wikipedia.